Proxy Disclosure About Executive Security

I spent the heart of the pandemic teaching myself how to make videos and made several dozen about what is – and what isn’t – considered a perquisite for proxy reporting purposes. As noted in this video, the question of “for purposes of the proxy statement filed with the SEC, is personal security a perk?” has a mixed answer. A lot of companies rightfully believe it has a legitimate business purpose. The SEC believes otherwise. The SEC thinks it’s a perk.

After last week’s tragic event, many companies likely will be re-evaluating whether they need executive security – and some may decide they believe it has a legitimate business purpose.

Here’s the disclosure that Lockheed Martin has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

And here’s the disclosure that Meta Platforms has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

Trending

Related Posts

Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible

Workiva: Common Snafus with Graphics

The Latest on Shareholder Engagement Disclosures

10 Ways to Optimize How You Present Board Skills

How to Write Letters from Leadership for Your Proxy

A Revamp of “Risk Oversight” Disclosures

Section

Recent Posts

ISS and Glass Lewis Still Wield Influence in the New Era
The Need to Execute the “Master Ballot” Before Your Annual Meeting
Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible
When Your Company Has Bad Financial News… Don’t Do Any of These Things
Three Reasons Why Disclosure Matters (Even Though No One Is Reading It)
How Investors Are Reacting (So Far) to the SEC’s Proposed Exec Comp Rollbacks