How “Selection of Incentive Metrics” Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years

Most shareholders cast their executive compensation advisory vote based on an assessment of pay and performance alignment. Accordingly, in addition to required CD&A disclosures about program objectives and elements, including if material, “specific items of corporate performance ”considered by the compensation committee under Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, it is also necessary to explain the rationale for selecting certain metrics for the company’s incentive plans and why they are important performance indicators given the company’s unique business and its strategic goals. Given the importance of metric selection, we have noticed recent efforts to make this disclosure more prominent, including use of headers or even dedicated sections.

Here’s an example from the 2025 Intel proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 RTX proxy:

Trending

Related Posts

Providing Understandable “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” Disclosure

Section

Recent Posts

How “Selection of Incentive Metrics” Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years
The Need for Visuals in the “Company Overview”
A Few Examples of Positive Outcomes Due to Good Disclosure
Providing Understandable “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” Disclosure
Proxy Disclosure: The Importance of Hearing It Straight From the Board
Considering a Retail ‘Opt In’ Voting Program? How to Be Persuasive