Proxy Disclosure About Executive Security

I spent the heart of the pandemic teaching myself how to make videos and made several dozen about what is – and what isn’t – considered a perquisite for proxy reporting purposes. As noted in this video, the question of “for purposes of the proxy statement filed with the SEC, is personal security a perk?” has a mixed answer. A lot of companies rightfully believe it has a legitimate business purpose. The SEC believes otherwise. The SEC thinks it’s a perk.

After last week’s tragic event, many companies likely will be re-evaluating whether they need executive security – and some may decide they believe it has a legitimate business purpose.

Here’s the disclosure that Lockheed Martin has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

And here’s the disclosure that Meta Platforms has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

Related Posts

To Say or Not to Say (and How to Say): That’s the (DEI) Question Facing Companies

Disclosure About New Types of C-Suite Officers (Such as CCOs, CSOs and CISOs)

Section

Recent Posts

How to Start Disclosure Drafting to Capture New Developments
Bob McCormick on CII (And Transparent Disclosure)
To Say or Not to Say (and How to Say): That’s the (DEI) Question Facing Companies
How to Handle Addressing Bad News in Disclosure
The Risks Posed by Floor Proposals
How “Usability” Can Play a Role in Transparent Disclosure