Proxy Disclosure About Executive Security

I spent the heart of the pandemic teaching myself how to make videos and made several dozen about what is – and what isn’t – considered a perquisite for proxy reporting purposes. As noted in this video, the question of “for purposes of the proxy statement filed with the SEC, is personal security a perk?” has a mixed answer. A lot of companies rightfully believe it has a legitimate business purpose. The SEC believes otherwise. The SEC thinks it’s a perk.

After last week’s tragic event, many companies likely will be re-evaluating whether they need executive security – and some may decide they believe it has a legitimate business purpose.

Here’s the disclosure that Lockheed Martin has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

And here’s the disclosure that Meta Platforms has about security for its CEO and other officers from its 2024 proxy:

Trending

Related Posts

How “Selection of Incentive Metrics” Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years

Providing Understandable “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” Disclosure

Section

Recent Posts

Proxy Season Trends: Governance Shareholder Proposals
6 Questions to Determine Whether You Should Update Your Code of Conduct
Addressing the Impact of Tariffs on Executive Pay
What Investors Expect From Board Diversity Disclosures
Disclosure About AI For Your Next Proxy
“Snapshot” and “At a Glance” in the Proxy