How Re-Nomination Process Disclosures Have Changed Over the Years

Director nomination disclosures historically have focused on the nomination and corporate governance committee’s recommendation of the slate of nominees for election. Often this section includes a statement that the committee annually considers the current composition of the board, as well as ongoing consideration of the board’s collective skills and needs in light of the company’s near and long-term strategic ambitions.

Many proxies then move directly into disclosure about the process for identifying new director candidates. More recently, however, companies are sharing more detail about how they consider the renomination of incumbent directors, with some companies emphasizing that re-nomination is not automatic.

Here’s an example from the 2025 JPMorgan Chase proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 Goldman Sachs proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 Mondelez proxy:

Trending

Related Posts

How “Compensation Recoupment Policies” Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years

Director Qualifications & Board Oversight: AI Being Mentioned More Frequently

Section

Recent Posts

Proxy Disclosure: The Importance of Hearing It Straight From the Board
Considering a Retail ‘Opt In’ Voting Program? How to Be Persuasive
How Re-Nomination Process Disclosures Have Changed Over the Years
How Director Time Commitment Disclosures Have Changed Over the Years
The Transparency Stats for the S&P 100 Companies
Hot Off the Press! The “Most Transparent” Companies in the US