How Re-Nomination Process Disclosures Have Changed Over the Years

Director nomination disclosures historically have focused on the nomination and corporate governance committee’s recommendation of the slate of nominees for election. Often this section includes a statement that the committee annually considers the current composition of the board, as well as ongoing consideration of the board’s collective skills and needs in light of the company’s near and long-term strategic ambitions.

Many proxies then move directly into disclosure about the process for identifying new director candidates. More recently, however, companies are sharing more detail about how they consider the renomination of incumbent directors, with some companies emphasizing that re-nomination is not automatic.

Here’s an example from the 2025 JPMorgan Chase proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 Goldman Sachs proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 Mondelez proxy:

Trending

Related Posts

Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible

Workiva: Common Snafus with Graphics

The Latest on Shareholder Engagement Disclosures

10 Ways to Optimize How You Present Board Skills

How to Write Letters from Leadership for Your Proxy

A Revamp of “Risk Oversight” Disclosures

Section

Recent Posts

The History of Proxy Design
4 More Tips to Make Your IR Web Content More Accessible
ISS and Glass Lewis Still Wield Influence in the New Era
The Need to Execute the “Master Ballot” Before Your Annual Meeting
Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible
When Your Company Has Bad Financial News… Don’t Do Any of These Things