Do Investors Who Publicize Their Vote Early Have Influence?

Transparency for fund voting. I found this blog by Jim McRitchie – on his long-standing – to be fascinating. Jim’s blog covers this new study entitled “Leading by Example: Can One Universal Shareholder’s Voting Pre-Disclosure Influence Voting Outcomes?” that finds that Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) has already gained influence after deciding to pre-disclose its proxy votes (typically 5 days before AGM) beginning in 2021. Jim’s blog also reviews the other efforts over the years to push funds to pre-disclose their votes.

Here is the abstract about the study: “We analyze the impact of a large shareholder disclosing its voting decisions prior to shareholder meetings on final vote outcomes for management and shareholder proposals. We find that pre-disclosures of against votes lead to an average increase of 2.7 percentage points in against votes by other shareholders. Voting pre-disclosures are more effective for proposals with a higher information demand, and if the large shareholder pre-discloses a decision that is not directly observable from its proxy-voting guidelines. The results highlight the potential for large institutional investors to use voting pre-disclosure as a tool for influencing other shareholders and, ultimately, companies.”

Related Posts


Recent Posts

What If All Directors Had Direct Relationships with Investors?
The Use of “New” Icons on IR Websites
Investor Relations Web Pages: Make Them Accessible
Four Bewildering Things About “Plain English”
The Transparency Awards: Ramping Up!
Investors Speak: Corporate Governance and Purpose