The “Pay Mix Graphic” for the Proxy

Transparency Criteria #66 for the proxy states: “The document includes disclosure of CEO and average NEOs pay mix presented as a graphic or using other visual elements.”

The “pay mix” graphic is designed to demonstrate that the CEO and other NEOs’ target compensation is appropriately at-risk and tied to performance. While some pay mix graphics may also weave in ratios of equity to non-equity or short to long-term, most pay mix presentations are high level. This is why the graphics are often found in the proxy summary. A simple check-the-box for readers that the company’s compensation program is performance-based.

Some companies present “pay mix” graphics with its compensation elements overview (see my recent blog about that overview). Together, they provide a more comprehensive snapshot of the program and insight into design objectives.

Some companies even go the extra mile and place a high level pay mix graphic in the proxy summary – and then also include a more detailed pay mix graphic in the CD&A summary.

Here is an example from Lowes’ 2023 proxy (page 29) that uses circles:

This example from the ConocoPhillips 2023 proxy (page 72) uses a bar graphic (and also is an example of a pay mix graphic with an elements table):

And I really like this example from the 2023 Mastercard proxy (page 70) too:

Trending

Related Posts

Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible

Workiva: Common Snafus with Graphics

The Latest on Shareholder Engagement Disclosures

10 Ways to Optimize How You Present Board Skills

How to Write Letters from Leadership for Your Proxy

A Revamp of “Risk Oversight” Disclosures

Section

Recent Posts

ISS and Glass Lewis Still Wield Influence in the New Era
The Need to Execute the “Master Ballot” Before Your Annual Meeting
Now Important: Making Board Disclosures AI Legible
When Your Company Has Bad Financial News… Don’t Do Any of These Things
Three Reasons Why Disclosure Matters (Even Though No One Is Reading It)
How Investors Are Reacting (So Far) to the SEC’s Proposed Exec Comp Rollbacks