How Director Bio Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years

As companies enhance their board skillset disclosures, nominee biographies also have been re-imagined in the proxy. To some extent, it seems that disclosure around director experience has come full circle and perhaps the newest presentation of board qualifications and skills in bios most closely aligns with the intent of the rule promulgated 15 years ago requiring “specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that the person should serve as a director . . . in light of the registrant’s business and structure.”

Bios that once laid out a director’s career path, together with a narrative discussion, moved to a bulleted format with career highlights and skills lists or icons. While easy-to-digest, readers needed to make the connection between the director’s professional background and the acquired skill. More recently, however, biographies directly and succinctly link qualifications with experience. Some companies even distinguish between type or level of experience.

Here’s an example from the 2025 Coca-Cola proxy:

And here’s an example from the 2025 CSX proxy:

Related Posts

To Say or Not to Say (and How to Say): That’s the (DEI) Question Facing Companies

Disclosure About New Types of C-Suite Officers (Such as CCOs, CSOs and CISOs)

Section

Recent Posts

How Director Bio Disclosure Has Changed Over the Years
Pam Marcogliese on “The Disclosure Journey”
Mark Borges on “The Art of Disclosure”
What’s in a Name? The Evolution of the Names Replacing the “ESG Report”
Rob Main on the Investor Perspective of Disclosure
How to Consider Peer Disclosures When Drafting Disclosures